<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Godin: Facebook, Twitter, Telephone Are for Talking, Not Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chasnote.com/2008/12/17/godin-facebook-twitter-telephone-are-for-talking-not-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/12/17/godin-facebook-twitter-telephone-are-for-talking-not-marketing/</link>
	<description>Metrics, successes &#38; flaming disasters in digital marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:27:42 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/12/17/godin-facebook-twitter-telephone-are-for-talking-not-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-60947</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasnote.com/2008/12/17/godin-facebook-twitter-telephone-are-for-talking-not-marketing/#comment-60947</guid>
		<description>SorenG--I think there&#039;s the opportunity for much more, stay tuned!  The key (to me, anyway) is figuring out what *native* advertising experiences would look like.  Thirty-second video commercials designed for TV networks, obviously, are native to a different environment, so that would be a disastrous Twitter experience -- just like print ads would be disastrous on TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SorenG&#8211;I think there&#8217;s the opportunity for much more, stay tuned!  The key (to me, anyway) is figuring out what *native* advertising experiences would look like.  Thirty-second video commercials designed for TV networks, obviously, are native to a different environment, so that would be a disastrous Twitter experience &#8212; just like print ads would be disastrous on TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SorenG</title>
		<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/12/17/godin-facebook-twitter-telephone-are-for-talking-not-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-60658</link>
		<dc:creator>SorenG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasnote.com/2008/12/17/godin-facebook-twitter-telephone-are-for-talking-not-marketing/#comment-60658</guid>
		<description>OK, so if traditional advertising will not work on FB or Twitter, what does? Is it just a place to put links of articles you write or find of interest, like Guy and others do? Is that the extent of &quot;non-traditional&quot; marketing for Twitter?

Is this all there is or is there more to it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so if traditional advertising will not work on FB or Twitter, what does? Is it just a place to put links of articles you write or find of interest, like Guy and others do? Is that the extent of &#8220;non-traditional&#8221; marketing for Twitter?</p>
<p>Is this all there is or is there more to it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
