<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Ad Spending May Grow, But Not Evenly Across All Online Formats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chasnote.com/2008/12/02/online-ad-spending-may-grow-but-not-evenly-across-all-online-formats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/12/02/online-ad-spending-may-grow-but-not-evenly-across-all-online-formats/</link>
	<description>Metrics, successes &#38; flaming disasters in digital marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:41:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/12/02/online-ad-spending-may-grow-but-not-evenly-across-all-online-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-60487</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasnote.com/2008/12/02/online-ad-spending-may-grow-but-not-evenly-across-all-online-formats/#comment-60487</guid>
		<description>@jackmayhofferr, I bet that the variance between formats will be much greater than 3%.  For example, paid search (which is dominated by Google) will be up by 25-35%, year over year.  If banner ads sold by horizontal ad networks are lucky, they&#039;ll be up 5-10%, which would mean growth at the bottom of my pyramid picture would be 3 to 7 times the growth in the middle.

My category definitions are imperfect.  But generally DR programs -- paid search, text ads and banners available via certain ad networks -- are purchased on cost-per-action basis such as cost-per-click (CPC).  Standard banners are sold on a cost-per-thousand impressions (CPM) basis.  By sponsorships and rich media, I&#039;m referring to special placements adjacent to unique, limited supply, high quality content. A TV analogy: middle pyramid stuff is buying a certain number of :30s that run within any of the shows or dayparts on a particular network; top of the pyramid is buying the first commercial in the first commercial break during Monday Night Football -- as well as sponsoring special programming during halftime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jackmayhofferr, I bet that the variance between formats will be much greater than 3%.  For example, paid search (which is dominated by Google) will be up by 25-35%, year over year.  If banner ads sold by horizontal ad networks are lucky, they&#8217;ll be up 5-10%, which would mean growth at the bottom of my pyramid picture would be 3 to 7 times the growth in the middle.</p>
<p>My category definitions are imperfect.  But generally DR programs &#8212; paid search, text ads and banners available via certain ad networks &#8212; are purchased on cost-per-action basis such as cost-per-click (CPC).  Standard banners are sold on a cost-per-thousand impressions (CPM) basis.  By sponsorships and rich media, I&#8217;m referring to special placements adjacent to unique, limited supply, high quality content. A TV analogy: middle pyramid stuff is buying a certain number of :30s that run within any of the shows or dayparts on a particular network; top of the pyramid is buying the first commercial in the first commercial break during Monday Night Football &#8212; as well as sponsoring special programming during halftime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackmayhofferr</title>
		<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/12/02/online-ad-spending-may-grow-but-not-evenly-across-all-online-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-60486</link>
		<dc:creator>jackmayhofferr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasnote.com/2008/12/02/online-ad-spending-may-grow-but-not-evenly-across-all-online-formats/#comment-60486</guid>
		<description>Looks all formats will have positive growth and the difference is less than 3% between formats.  Since this is a &quot;forecast&quot;, that &gt;3% seems a reasonable margin of error, so the impact may be nil.  I do agree that marketers will be looking for more accountability in all areas of marketing, esp. online. 

Also, not sure what the difference is between a DR banner and a &quot;Standard&quot; banner.  Is a standard banner, one that is run with out targeting or regard to ROI?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks all formats will have positive growth and the difference is less than 3% between formats.  Since this is a &#8220;forecast&#8221;, that &gt;3% seems a reasonable margin of error, so the impact may be nil.  I do agree that marketers will be looking for more accountability in all areas of marketing, esp. online. </p>
<p>Also, not sure what the difference is between a DR banner and a &#8220;Standard&#8221; banner.  Is a standard banner, one that is run with out targeting or regard to ROI?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florent</title>
		<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/12/02/online-ad-spending-may-grow-but-not-evenly-across-all-online-formats/comment-page-1/#comment-60485</link>
		<dc:creator>Florent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasnote.com/2008/12/02/online-ad-spending-may-grow-but-not-evenly-across-all-online-formats/#comment-60485</guid>
		<description>100% agree with that. The only escape for branded publishers is &quot;up the ladder&quot; since they can&#039;t offer search and, frankly, are not this efficient on direct response programs. So it means more expansive ad programs (increasing cost of sales and marketing) while 70% of the unsold inventory will be sold at depressed remnant rates (think 75cts max for the ones that are used to tap above the dollar). 
Great chart!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% agree with that. The only escape for branded publishers is &#8220;up the ladder&#8221; since they can&#8217;t offer search and, frankly, are not this efficient on direct response programs. So it means more expansive ad programs (increasing cost of sales and marketing) while 70% of the unsold inventory will be sold at depressed remnant rates (think 75cts max for the ones that are used to tap above the dollar).<br />
Great chart!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
