<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starbucks Dabbles with Corporate Democracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chasnote.com/2008/05/16/starbucks-dabbles-with-corporate-democracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/05/16/starbucks-dabbles-with-corporate-democracy/</link>
	<description>Metrics, successes &#38; flaming disasters in digital marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:34:34 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/05/16/starbucks-dabbles-with-corporate-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-59104</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 06:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasnote.com/2008/05/16/starbucks-dabbles-with-corporate-democracy/#comment-59104</guid>
		<description>Jeff--I&#039;m not sure it does.  I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything wrong with brands paying customers for feedback and suggestions; the practice of paid focus groups is older than I am!  Starbucks improves on the focus group model in at least two ways.  One, they&#039;re getting feedback from a much larger pool of customers, not just a handful behind the one-way glass.  Two, these customers are motivated to participate by a desire to make Starbucks better, not a check from the focus-group firm.  Good for Starbucks.  But their win, in my opinion, doesn&#039;t make brands who use paid research -- in relation -- a bunch of losers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff&#8211;I&#8217;m not sure it does.  I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything wrong with brands paying customers for feedback and suggestions; the practice of paid focus groups is older than I am!  Starbucks improves on the focus group model in at least two ways.  One, they&#8217;re getting feedback from a much larger pool of customers, not just a handful behind the one-way glass.  Two, these customers are motivated to participate by a desire to make Starbucks better, not a check from the focus-group firm.  Good for Starbucks.  But their win, in my opinion, doesn&#8217;t make brands who use paid research &#8212; in relation &#8212; a bunch of losers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Kutchera</title>
		<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/05/16/starbucks-dabbles-with-corporate-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-59103</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Kutchera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasnote.com/2008/05/16/starbucks-dabbles-with-corporate-democracy/#comment-59103</guid>
		<description>While some folks criticized their idea as being half-hearted, I say hats off to a big company for really trying to connect with its audience.  The next question is: are they advertising with Federated Media?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While some folks criticized their idea as being half-hearted, I say hats off to a big company for really trying to connect with its audience.  The next question is: are they advertising with Federated Media?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/05/16/starbucks-dabbles-with-corporate-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-59081</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasnote.com/2008/05/16/starbucks-dabbles-with-corporate-democracy/#comment-59081</guid>
		<description>Cheers, Chas. 
The difference is that Starbucks isn&#039;t paying for these views. That changes things, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers, Chas.<br />
The difference is that Starbucks isn&#8217;t paying for these views. That changes things, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
