<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Yorker Alleges Dove&#8217;s &#8216;Real Beauty&#8217; Photos Airbrushed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chasnote.com/2008/05/08/new-yorker-alleges-doves-real-beauty-photos-airbrushed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/05/08/new-yorker-alleges-doves-real-beauty-photos-airbrushed/</link>
	<description>Metrics, successes &#38; flaming disasters in digital marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:41:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jackie</title>
		<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/05/08/new-yorker-alleges-doves-real-beauty-photos-airbrushed/comment-page-1/#comment-59070</link>
		<dc:creator>jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasnote.com/2008/05/08/new-yorker-alleges-doves-real-beauty-photos-airbrushed/#comment-59070</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it have been interesting to turn this happen stance into a conversation or even a debate about what the public thinks. I see a great opportunity that could have turned into a listening exercise and game changing role. 

Ad Age ran an article yesterday by Jonah Bloom that made a great point about just that and also another thought to consider:

&quot; I haven&#039;t heard of a smarter way of doing that than P&amp;G&#039;s recent decision to let consumers make the decisions on two media controversies: the company&#039;s support for TV shows that contained perceived profanity and shows displaying gay kissing. Perhaps that&#039;s what Unilever should&#039;ve done in this case too -- put it to a vote: Do you want your billboards complete with every last pubic hair or do you agree that there&#039;s such a thing as too real? &quot; 

- Ogilvy, Dove Miss Chance to Turn Bad Press Into &#039;Debate&#039; 

maybe it really would have been a bit to real?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it have been interesting to turn this happen stance into a conversation or even a debate about what the public thinks. I see a great opportunity that could have turned into a listening exercise and game changing role. </p>
<p>Ad Age ran an article yesterday by Jonah Bloom that made a great point about just that and also another thought to consider:</p>
<p>&#8221; I haven&#8217;t heard of a smarter way of doing that than P&amp;G&#8217;s recent decision to let consumers make the decisions on two media controversies: the company&#8217;s support for TV shows that contained perceived profanity and shows displaying gay kissing. Perhaps that&#8217;s what Unilever should&#8217;ve done in this case too &#8212; put it to a vote: Do you want your billboards complete with every last pubic hair or do you agree that there&#8217;s such a thing as too real? &#8221; </p>
<p>- Ogilvy, Dove Miss Chance to Turn Bad Press Into &#8216;Debate&#8217; </p>
<p>maybe it really would have been a bit to real?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas</title>
		<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/05/08/new-yorker-alleges-doves-real-beauty-photos-airbrushed/comment-page-1/#comment-59061</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 14:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasnote.com/2008/05/08/new-yorker-alleges-doves-real-beauty-photos-airbrushed/#comment-59061</guid>
		<description>Ha!  True enough.  But the mistake Doves makes, in my opinion, is suggesting that this campaign is in fact different from other ad campaigns: no professional models, no unrealistic bodies, nothing to make the rest of feel insecure about how we look.  Dove Evolution, the viral-video cousin to this Real Beauty campaign, draws much of its power from showing us why the models we see in ad campaigns have a kind of beauty that is so unattainable -- their &quot;perfect&quot; beauty is largely manufactured in post-production stage, the computer-aided process of removing blemishes and reshaping anatomy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  True enough.  But the mistake Doves makes, in my opinion, is suggesting that this campaign is in fact different from other ad campaigns: no professional models, no unrealistic bodies, nothing to make the rest of feel insecure about how we look.  Dove Evolution, the viral-video cousin to this Real Beauty campaign, draws much of its power from showing us why the models we see in ad campaigns have a kind of beauty that is so unattainable &#8212; their &#8220;perfect&#8221; beauty is largely manufactured in post-production stage, the computer-aided process of removing blemishes and reshaping anatomy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miconian</title>
		<link>http://chasnote.com/2008/05/08/new-yorker-alleges-doves-real-beauty-photos-airbrushed/comment-page-1/#comment-59051</link>
		<dc:creator>miconian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chasnote.com/2008/05/08/new-yorker-alleges-doves-real-beauty-photos-airbrushed/#comment-59051</guid>
		<description>No doubt they were also wearing makeup, clothing custom-made to flatter their bodies, and were photographed under ideal lighting conditions. The horror. Once an image becomes part of a piece of media, it&#039;s just not part of &#039;reality&#039; anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt they were also wearing makeup, clothing custom-made to flatter their bodies, and were photographed under ideal lighting conditions. The horror. Once an image becomes part of a piece of media, it&#8217;s just not part of &#8216;reality&#8217; anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
