Is Frictionless Ad-Buying Good for Publishers?

Jeff Jarvis’s latest column for The Guardian (see BuzzMachine) proposes an “open ad marketplace”:

“By doing this, we take the friction out of the ad marketplace: every blog is an atom and every ad campaign is a molecule that attracts the best. Thus both advertisers and media gain control and increase their effectiveness and their value. In this post-scarcity world, freed of the limitations of the page and the clock, you could argue that as no end of ad inventory becomes available, rates will only drop. But I also believe that advertisers will pay higher rates for the right sites that perform efficiently for them. Thus quality sites will earn more and advertisers will waste less. That is the value of openness.”

I agree that media buying, selling and the metrics that inform them both are in need of serious improvement. Today most of the control is still in the hands of a few enormous media companies that don’t have a vested interest in innovation or upgrading the current system.

But I don’t think that a “frictionless” open marketplace benefits buyers and sellers equally. Much of the friction in today’s model comes from the publisher side, ie, the content producers and their appointed media sellers. The folks who put their hearts and souls into a magazine or TV network or web site want to make the case to advertisers that the editorial product they produce, and the conversation it engenders, are unique. That uniqueness, they argue, deserves a premium. While an advertiser can find those same people — say the few million people who watch The West Wing — watching other shows or reading certain websites, there’s extra value to reaching them when they’re watching The West Wing. And making that case, god forbid, usually requires a bit of high-friction human contact.

Google has shown us that algorithms can work wonders for direct marketers looking to drive clicks at the lowest cost. Whether or not marketing algorithms can create the next Absolut, Starbucks or Nike, is — to say the least — an open question. Great advertising is about more than “efficient performance,” and best publications do something that even the most thorough spreadsheets can’t compute.

My worry is this: Create a frictionless, rational, performance-oriented marketplace for ads, and content quality and editorial innovation go down the drain.

Related, Jeff’s reply.

  1. # BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » Open ads said: April 17th, 2006 at 6:43 am

    [...] More discussion about the notion of open ad networks: Here’s the response of Chas Edwards of Federated Media to my post and column and here’s my reply. [...]

  2. # BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » Open ad marketplace, continued said: April 19th, 2006 at 8:38 am

    [...] Pat McCarthy replies to Chas Edwards’ questions about value in an open ad marketplace: Just because an open ad marketplace is “frictionless”, doesn’t mean these same advertisers couldn’t find these same high quality publishers and advertise on their inventory. The value of an auction is that it bids the value of inventory up. If Fred Wilson’s blog advertising was available in an open marketplace, he could still get a premium for his inventory, and only accept advertisers he wanted to work with. [...]

  3. # Kottke joins The Deck ad network » mathewingram.com/work said: April 19th, 2006 at 1:38 pm

    [...] with del.icio.us   |   Email this entry   |   TrackBack URI   |   Digg it   |  [...]

  4. # Response to Chas | Triggit Blog said: April 19th, 2006 at 1:51 pm

    [...] There has been an interesting thread about an open ad marketplace which Jeff Jarvis started with this article in the Guardian.  Chas over at FM has an response here that is a worth read. [...]

  5. # Metrics, successes, & flaming disasters in online marketing said: May 4th, 2006 at 6:24 am

    [...] For those of you who called me a media dinosaur after my post on the extreme visions of frictionless media buying (ChasNote 4/14/06), here’s a step in the right direction! Powered by WordPress [...]

  6. # Porn Plaza said: July 5th, 2006 at 9:27 am

    385
    The very best portal for all your porn links is Porn Plaza

  7. # Jeff Jarvis: More on the Open Ad Marketplace at ChasNote said: February 8th, 2007 at 11:12 pm

    [...] Blog « Is Frictionless Ad-Buying Good for Publishers? Web Will Collect More Ad Revenue than Print Magazines in 2006 » [...]

Leave a Reply